Practical guide

How to draft a request for conversion of attachment with AI

4 min read · Updated June 2026 · Editorial oversight: Avv. Federico Papa

The request for conversion of attachment (istanza di conversione del pignoramento), governed by Art. 495 of the Italian Code of Civil Procedure (c.p.c.), is the procedural act by which the judgment debtor seeks to replace attached assets with a sum of money equal to the total amount of the claims of the attaching creditor and any intervening creditors, together with enforcement costs. This procedure balances the creditor's interest in obtaining satisfaction with the debtor's interest in avoiding the forced sale of movable or immovable property; however, the assets remain subject to the attachment lien and the debtor acts as custodian until the proceeding is extinguished. The request is admissible only if filed before the sale or assignment of the assets is ordered and must be accompanied by the initial payment required by law. It represents a key instrument for managing debt positions during enforcement.

In brief

The request for conversion of attachment under Art. 495 c.p.c. enables debtors to substitute attached assets with a sum covering all claims. Drafting this act, which may involve AI, must occur before the Enforcement Judge orders the sale or assignment. Admissibility depends on depositing one-sixth of the total debt. The Enforcement Judge evaluates justified reasons for installment plans up to 48 months. Any payment delay exceeding 30 days triggers the forfeiture of the conversion and the resumption of the forced sale. This procedural tool is available only once per R.G.E.

The steps

  1. 1.

    Verification of timeliness and procedural status

    The primary requirement under Art. 495 c.p.c. is the timeliness of the filing, which must occur before the Enforcement Judge (Giudice dell'Esecuzione) orders the sale or assignment of assets. It is necessary to inspect the electronic court file to verify that the sale order has not yet been issued, as missing this deadline renders the request inadmissible. The legal practitioner must ensure that the attachment was duly perfected and that no previous conversion request was rejected, since the application may be submitted only once. This preliminary verification avoids immediate rejection on procedural grounds and unnecessary payments of security deposits.

  2. 2.

    Calculation and payment of the one-sixth deposit

    The application is admissible only if accompanied by the deposit in the court registry of a sum equal to at least one-sixth of the total amount of the claims of the attaching creditor and any intervening creditors. The calculation of the one-sixth quota must be based on the debt stated in the attachment deed and in the petitions for intervention; the definitive quantification of interest and costs is reserved for the Judge at the hearing. Payment must be made via a judicial deposit account or a cashier's check made payable to the execution proceeding, and the receipt must be electronically attached to the application. A missing or insufficient payment results in the incurable inadmissibility of the conversion request.

  3. 3.

    Determination of the total amount and request for installment payments

    In the application, the debtor must offer to pay the entire sum required to discharge the debt, including principal, interest, and procedural costs. Art. 495 c.p.c. grants the Judge the discretion, upon showing justified grounds, to authorize monthly installment payments of the remaining sum over a maximum period of 48 months. Counsel must adequately substantiate the request for installments by demonstrating the debtor's economic position and the viability of the proposed repayment plan. It is advisable to attach supporting financial documentation proving the debtor's income capacity to meet the schedule.

  4. 4.

    Drafting the application and formal requirements

    The application must state the exact General Register of Enforcement (R.G.E.) number and the full identification details of the parties. It must unequivocally express the debtor's commitment to replace the attached assets (movable, immovable, or garnished from third parties) with a sum of money pursuant to Art. 495 c.p.c. The statute solely requires filing the application with the court registry; the debtor is under no obligation to serve the motion on opposing parties, as the hearing notice is served by the court registry. A clear presentation of the factual background and the debtor's financial stability supports the granting of the motion.

  5. 5.

    Hearing and order of the Enforcement Judge

    Upon filing, the Enforcement Judge schedules a hearing for the parties to appear and for the determination of the total amount due. At the hearing, the Judge quantifies the final amount, taking into account the statements of claim filed by the creditors. If the motion is granted, the Judge issues an order determining the schedule and terms of the payments and ordering the suspension of the sale. Only upon full payment of the final installment or total balance will the Judge issue an order declaring the attachment extinguished and the assets released from the lien.

Legal basis: art. 495 c.p.c.

The template structure

The standard sections that make up the document. The full template can be opened and completed directly on edit.legal.

  1. Enforcement Judge

    Identification of the competent Judicial Court and the General Register number (R.G.E.) of the pending proceeding.

  2. Petitioning Debtor

    Personal details, tax code, and elected domicile of the judgment debtor filing the conversion request.

  3. Premises: the enforcement proceeding

    Factual summary of the attachment, summary of asserted claims, and proof of payment of the initial security deposit.

  4. Conversion request

    Formal motion for replacement of attached assets with a sum of money and proposed installment plan for remaining sums pursuant to Art. 495 c.p.c.

  5. Place, date, signature

    Place, date of filing, and digital signature of counsel acting under power of attorney.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Filing the request after the sale order has been issued, resulting in inadmissibility due to untimeliness.
  • Calculating the one-sixth deposit solely on principal, excluding accrued interest and enforcement costs.
  • Failing to attach the proof of deposit of the one-sixth quota during electronic filing.
  • Proposing an installment plan exceeding the 48-month statutory maximum or lacking documented justification.

Frequently asked questions

Can the conversion request be submitted more than once?

No, pursuant to Art. 495 c.p.c., the debtor may file a conversion request only once in the same execution proceeding. If a prior request was rejected or declared inadmissible, it cannot be refiled.

What happens if the debtor delays the payment of a single installment?

Failure to pay or a delay exceeding 30 days for even a single installment causes forfeiture of the installment benefit. In such cases, the Enforcement Judge immediately orders the resumption of the sale of the attached assets.

Is creditor consent necessary to obtain an installment plan?

No, creditor consent is not required or binding, as the evaluation of justified grounds rests solely with the Enforcement Judge. Nevertheless, creditors may submit observations regarding the amount of the claims and the viability of the repayment plan.

Avv. Federico Papa
Editorial oversight: Avv. Federico Papa·ICAM

What edit.legal automates

  • Automatic calculation of the one-sixth (1/6) deposit based on the total claim amount.
  • Automated insertion of Art. 495 c.p.c. references and installment payment clauses.
  • AI-assisted verification of procedural requirements and deadlines prior to electronic filing.

Put edit.legal to the test on actual cases

Try edit.legal for free on an active case. No credit card required.

Try edit.legal for free